Atanu Dey on India’s Development

No true terrorist acts

The Hindu reports that an official of the “Indian Union Muslim League has asked the media and public to not to brand the perpetrators of the deed as Muslims.”

“I appeal to the media and the public not to brand the perpetrators of the Bangalore blasts as Muslims,” State president of IUML K M Khader Mohideen told reporters here on Saturday night.

“These kind of people are neither Muslims, Hindus or Christians. The Centre and the state government should take steps to nab them quickly,” he said.

That’s an example of what is called the “No true Scotsman” fallacy, a fallacy of equivocation and question begging. Here it is, from Thinking about Thinking (1975), by Andrew Flew:

Imagine Hamish McDonald, a Scotsman, sitting down with his Glasgow Morning Herald and seeing an article about how the “Brighton Sex Maniac Strikes Again.” Hamish is shocked and declares that “No Scotsman would do such a thing.” The next day he sits down to read his Glasgow Morning Herald again and this time finds an article about an Aberdeen man whose brutal actions make the Brighton sex maniac seem almost gentlemanly. This fact shows that Hamish was wrong in his opinion but is he going to admit this? Not likely. This time he says, “No true Scotsman would do such a thing.”

As long as we are declaring that the self-proclaimed bombers who self-identify themselves as Muslims and their organizations as explicitly Islamic are not Muslims, why don’t we go the whole hog and declare that there were no terrorists bombings, that there were no deaths, that everything is peaceful and tranquil?

Let’s live in fairy-land as the reality is too painful and our so-called leaders are powerless to do sh!7.

July 28, 2008 - Posted by | Islamic Terrorism--Jihad

3 Comments

  1. See — you finally got round and saw reason!
    Shivraj Patil and Manmoron have been saying exactly this for the past 4 years.

    Which is why they’re leaders and you — we — all of us — are just losers!

    Comment by AGWorld | July 28, 2008

  2. Regarding
    “As long as we are declaring that the self-proclaimed bombers who self-identify themselves as Muslims and their organizations
    as explicitly Islamic are not Muslims”

    It doesnt matter what the opponent identifies themselves as.

    War with germany/japan (a far more technicaly challenging adversary) for US was settled in a way india is capable of doing, if it decides so.

    More bombs were dropped on germany than your respected BinQuasistan/Ghauristan by the “oil seeking neocons(as dey sees them)”

    Now if pseudoislamic (or neoislamic) culture of Sunehra Bharat are going to still wank over its “vedic heritage” or its tharki paad war “victory of 71” instead of realizing the sea of turd they are in theres a hope, if they thing the nuggets are gold well then may they swallow it.

    Comment by Notsure | July 29, 2008

  3. islamic or non islamic they are killing our people is not that enough.Of course islamic have the propensity for violence,and they are the only people who will kill without any conscience or remorse.History and present are a testimony to this fact.

    Comment by pankaj | July 29, 2008


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.